Pak-Indo Contention

447
It has been noted that each regime of the World, is adhered to another opponent realm. This worse and unidentified turmoil has indulged countries to countries in contentions, while sometimes these opponent regimes have seen to be reluctant for ending this fierce aspect. Likewise if we open the pages of history then it displayed that how one country is busy to demolish second one for instance, Iraq's past dispute with Muscat, Syria's contemporary screws with adverse regimes, Qatar confronts the surplus of Saudi Arabia plus its allies, Iran is facing the threats of United State of America plus Pakistan and India are two deep opponents which achieved an irony status of adversaries in entire world by their prolonged conflicts that carried them at unexpected stages of aversion. History Argues that India has always shown abhors behavior towards of Pakistan. Many experts argue that the Kashmir dispute has been bone of contention that played a vital role to avert both neighbors. Building this argument, the two wars plus cluster of treaties are enough to claimers for stating that the Kashmir's conflict is solely way of resentment. While, time shows that the background of contention is not just limited with this issue. Many other turmoil are surrounded at outskirts of both regimes, including Water dispute, issue of Line of Control (LOC), alleged terrorism plus giving up to various sources of Communications. However, the root cause of contention would be explicated by following aspects. Documentation claims that the British incumbents ruled over subcontinent for more than 100 years. In this epoch of western occupation, Muslim and Hindus were confounded on British adjudication where they were working as slaves on their own lands. The entire resources of subcontinent were being transmitted to European countries while the populations of Hindus plus Muslims were dying due to starvation. Afterwards, both nations realised this servitude and worked to persuade their notions to get impunity from British rulers. Albeit, after long fatigues, the year of 1947 was proved worth for both parties where one got freedom on 14 August (Pakistan), while second one met with independence on 15 August (Hindustan). But the real story was started after the independence of both countries when they used ideology as weapon to vanquish each other. Hindus were in majority plus British rulers were supporting them, while Muslim got frustration by remaining cognizant from any aid which pushes them towards of prosperity. It was initial moment which afterwards rewarded many unexpected turmoils to both countries, but miserably solely affected on Pakistan. Arguably; Kashmir dispute was another tragedy which started by British authorities who didn't divide properly to the territory of both countries. In 1961, Kashmir was considered as a separate state which was ruled by a Sikh Maharaja. History revealed that Pakistan started raid to snatch her occupied territory neither from Sikh's capturing which created turmoil for Maharaja of Kashmir, owning to that area was not merged nor with Pakistan neither with India at that time. So, the Maharaja requested India to come and defend his territory from Pakistan's incursion. In this incident, Hindus captured large territory of Kashmir which is still in occupation of India. Past shows that two wars were fought between both countries for conquering Kashmir but it deteriorated more there alliances. Intensely: Beside Kashmir, water turmoil remains another dispute between Pakistan and India. At the time of Partition, Pakistan met with three rivers while India with twice rivers. Unfortunately, The river's passage are linking with Indian territory which she used as weapon to cause detrimental for state of Pakistan likewise, in 1969, when India suppressed the flowing of these rivers which gave cluster of loopholes to Pakistan mainly affected on agricultural sector that afterwards impacted on economy of Quaid's state. This incident induced United Nations plus aspired countries to eradicate this too. This incident induced United nations plus aspired countries to eradicate this turmoil where the made a treaty, known as Water Canal dispute which persuaded both countries to accept the prescribed rules of UN. This accord availed with Pakistan to construct dams and barrages by the help of World Bank and to secure rampant water for escaping from future's turmoil’s. Arguing; the third worse aspect began in 1971 when Pakistan tried to suppress the mutiny leader of East Pakistan (Sheikh Mujeeb Ur Rehman). General Ayub khan ordered his infantries for raiding on rebels, but Indian started supporting

It has been noted that each regime of the World, is adhered to another opponent realm. This worse and unidentified turmoil has indulged countries to countries in contentions, while sometimes these opponent regimes have seen to be reluctant for ending this fierce aspect. Likewise if we open the pages of history then it displayed that how one country is busy to demolish second one for instance, Iraq’s past dispute with Muscat, Syria’s contemporary screws with adverse regimes, Qatar confronts the surplus of Saudi Arabia plus its allies, Iran is facing the threats of United State of America plus Pakistan and India are two deep opponents which achieved an irony status of adversaries in entire world by their prolonged conflicts that carried them at unexpected stages of aversion.

History Argues that India has always shown abhors behavior towards of Pakistan. Many experts argue that the Kashmir dispute has been bone of contention that played a vital role to avert both neighbors. Building this argument, the two wars plus cluster of treaties are enough to claimers for stating that the Kashmir’s conflict is solely way of resentment. While, time shows that the background of contention is not just limited with this issue. Many other turmoil are surrounded at outskirts of both regimes, including Water dispute, issue of Line of Control (LOC), alleged terrorism plus giving up to various sources of Communications. However, the root cause of contention would be explicated by following aspects.

Documentation claims that the British incumbents ruled over subcontinent for more than 100 years. In this epoch of western occupation, Muslim and Hindus were confounded on British adjudication where they were working as slaves on their own lands. The entire resources of subcontinent were being transmitted to European countries while the populations of Hindus plus Muslims were dying due to starvation. Afterwards, both nations realised this servitude and worked to persuade their notions to get impunity from British rulers. Albeit, after long fatigues, the year of 1947 was proved worth for both parties where one got freedom on 14 August (Pakistan), while second one met with independence on 15 August (Hindustan). But the real story was started after the independence of both countries when they used ideology as weapon to vanquish each other. Hindus were in majority plus British rulers were supporting them, while Muslim got frustration by remaining cognizant from any aid which pushes them towards of prosperity. It was initial moment which afterwards rewarded many unexpected turmoils to both countries, but miserably solely affected on Pakistan.

READ Also:  15th prime minister fails to complete tenure

Arguably; Kashmir dispute was another tragedy which started by British authorities who didn’t divide properly to the territory of both countries. In 1961, Kashmir was considered as a separate state which was ruled by a Sikh Maharaja. History revealed that Pakistan started raid to snatch her occupied territory neither from Sikh’s capturing which created turmoil for Maharaja of Kashmir, owning to that area was not merged nor with Pakistan neither with India at that time. So, the Maharaja requested India to come and defend his territory from Pakistan’s incursion. In this incident, Hindus captured large territory of Kashmir which is still in occupation of India. Past shows that two wars were fought between both countries for conquering Kashmir but it deteriorated more there alliances.

Subscribe Us to get daily updates
Enter your email address to get daily updates :


Delivered by FeedBurner

Intensely: Beside Kashmir, water turmoil remains another dispute between Pakistan and India. At the time of Partition, Pakistan met with three rivers while India with twice rivers. Unfortunately, The river’s passage are linking with Indian territory which she used as weapon to cause detrimental for state of Pakistan likewise, in 1969, when India suppressed the flowing of these rivers which gave cluster of loopholes to Pakistan mainly affected on agricultural sector that afterwards impacted on economy of Quaid’s state. This incident induced United Nations plus aspired countries to eradicate this too.

READ Also:  The Supreme Court and the Prime Ministers

This incident induced United nations plus aspired countries to eradicate this turmoil where the made a treaty, known as Water Canal dispute which persuaded both countries to accept the prescribed rules of UN. This accord availed with Pakistan to construct dams and barrages by the help of World Bank and to secure rampant water for escaping from future’s turmoil’s.

Arguing; the third worse aspect began in 1971 when Pakistan tried to suppress the mutiny leader of East Pakistan (Sheikh Mujeeb Ur Rehman). General Ayub khan ordered his infantries for raiding on rebels, but Indian started supporting ” Mukti Bahini ” insurgents which consequences revealed the vanquish of Pakistan. In this war, more than 90, 000 people faced imprisoned who afterwards met with servitude in 1972-73, when ZA Bhooto created solvable ways with Indian leader Mrs. Gandhi to end this turmoil. This treaty is fame by the name of “Shimla Accord“, in which both countries were agreed to solve their issues on negotiation table plus explore ways for further coalition.

History shows that this type of accords didn’t meet with triumph to eradicate the processed turmoil of dispute. Both states have signed cluster of treaties, but none of them complied with their pledge to scatter peace in their regions.

Additionally; a new turmoil started in 1998, when terrorist attacked on Bombay which snatched the lives of thousand people. As routine India alleged Pakistan for supporting terrorist which created more tension between both countries. Time gave another chance when Indian Prime Minister arrived in Lahore for attending SAARC Summit. As past, patrons of both country made clusters of promises as well showed that the contention of both state is near to be solved, but these just remained pledges, but didn’t induce towards of implementations.

READ Also:  The nuclear dimension (By: Munir Akram)

It is reality that the passed history of both countries is filled with aversion. This displeasure facet of both countries has kept them far from table. Recently the statement of Indian espionage revealed many unbelievable aspects which is enough for enunciating that which country is bone of contention India or Pakistan? He (spy) clearly stated that the state of India is supporting rebels of Baluchistan who are raising upheavals against state. This case was reached at international court of justice that ordered Pakistan to highlight more evidences about captured espionage. However, its not important to merely focus on one-sided decision of ICJ, but its more focusing that why India is involved in interventionism. It clearly indicates that the proxy wars in Pakistan, are pushing ahead by Indian support which won’t let both countries in coalition.

Pakistan and India are important states of Central Asia and time is requiring the coalition of both countries right now. Its responsibility of western power to use their impetus not to deteriorate the situations of both countries but engage them towards of prosperity. Its need of time as well is best way to eradicate the prolonged dispute.

Please Share your comments using Facebook ID

SHARE
Sikander Rind
The writer is Bs in education and CSS Aspirant.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here